National Audit Office Report – managing the costs of clinical negligence in Trusts

Posted By: on 20th October 2017 | Category: Personal Injury

The National Audit Office recently published its report managing the costs of clinical negligence in Trusts.

Sadly and rather disappointingly, the report has placed little emphasis on its recommendations in 2001 to the NHS to reduce the number of clinical incidents.

Instead, the focus of the report appears to be solely on claimants’ lawyers’ costs.

There is a complete and obvious failure to examine the delays caused by NHS Trusts or their representative body (known previously as the NHS Litigation Authority, currently known as NHS Resolution), which of themselves have contributed to an increase in legal costs.

The report has fuelled misguided suggestions, an example being one by The Guardian columnist Polly Toynbee that, as a result of this report, it is time to bring back Crown immunity for NHS Trusts. This would prevent NHS patients from pursuing claims in negligence against Trusts.

Since the passage of The Crown Proceedings Act in 1947, the NHS has been liable for all negligent acts and omissions.

To prevent claims against the NHS would result in a two tier legal system. It would prevent those who receive negligent medical treatment from the NHS from pursuing rightful claims, whilst allowing claims to those in similar circumstances who received receiving private medical treatment.

The duty of candour was introduced in 2014. This was hoped to encourage a culture of openness. However, the treatment of whistle-blowers within the NHS has historically been extremely poor. Had a more open culture been encouraged, then such cases as those of Ian Patterson would almost certainly have been stopped.

In view of many lawyers representing claimants, the National Audit Office has failed patients with this report and it is feared that the Government will be guilty of similar failure if they base any legal reform on its findings.

There is currently a suggestion that the Government proposes to provide indemnity to GPs facing allegations of negligence. This has been prompted by a desire to encourage more GPs to take up positions.

If so, any claims being faced by GPs will also be handled by a Government authority no doubt set up to avoid settling as many claims as possible in a desire to save the NHS money.

The focus of attention here appears to be to protect the wrongdoer rather than the innocent injured party.

Article by Parisa Costigan
Coole Bevis LLP
Tel: 01403 224608


Brighton Solicitors

Lanes End House,
15 Prince Albert Street,
Brighton BN1 1HY
t. +44 (0)1273 323231
f. +44 (0)1273 820350

Horsham Solicitors

14 Carfax,
West Sussex RH12 1DZ
t. +44 (0)1403 210200
f. +44 (0)1403 241275

Hove Solicitors

79 Church Road,
East Sussex BN3 2BB
t. +44 (0)1273 722532
f. +44 (0)1273 326347

Worthing Solicitors

5 The Steyne,
West Sussex BN11 3DT
t. +44 (0)1903 213511
f. +44 (0)1903 237053